Kris Houlton and I met when we were both working for the California Labor Federation in San Francisco a few years ago. She's now pursuing a master's degree in feminist philosophy and has just sent word that she's now a published scholar! (She also writes awesome letters to the editor.)
Kris has written a case study that will eventually be included in a book authored by the University of Minnesota's Center on Women
and Public Policy. It's available in full online (scroll all the way down).
Here's her abstract for "To Strike or Not to Strike: The University of Minnesota Clerical Workers’ Decision":
In the fall of 2003, the workers of AFSCME Local 3801 and Local
3800 had to decide whether to go on strike against their employer, the
University of Minnesota. The case reviews Minnesota labor law and the
history of AFSCME at the U of M. Because of a pattern of devaluing
clerical workers at the U of M, these workers have historically been
the least-paid and their collective bargaining agreements the weakest
of all the University unions. Leadership of AFSCME 3800, a union whose
membership is 94% female, attributes this devaluation to
institutionalized sexism. The common perception is that the
male-dominated Teamsters union at the University has consistently
received better contract offers from the administration. During the
period of the breakdown in negotiations, not only the administration’s
negotiators but also the other unions at the U met the prospect of an
AFSCME strike with disbelief by. No one believed that the “secretaries”
would strike, since it would be "mean."
This case
explores the dilemma confronting AFSCME members in the face of a
potential strike. Three broad categories of workers resisted the
strike: non-voting “fair share” clerical workers who felt alienated
from the union, members who felt the University was offering the best
deal it could, and those who could not afford to strike without strike
support funds. The case explores each of these perspectives to give the
reader the background information needed to understand the reluctance
to strike. The case also includes the perspectives of several AFSCME
leaders who advocated striking and were called upon to communicate this
to the membership.
[sigh] "Common perceptions" keep many a good woman down!