« October 2005 | Main | December 2005 »

Sweet and Lowdown

I've been deeply intrigued by painter-turned-photographer Elizabeth Hendler's freaky, stylized conceptual art since I encountered her sly Cupcake Series a couple of years ago.

Munchhorizon

I didn't think there was anything I could love more until I saw The Secretary Killers.

Secretary_killers_1

Elizabeth has an extensive portfolio of her work online, along with a highly intriguing bio explaining some of the personal factors and cultural elements influencing her work:

I was a painter most of my life until a motorcycle crash gave me a near death experience and left me with physical trauma that made painting impossible. At that time I began using photography to create my art. I describe through narratives the inner psychology of the subject. Most of my work centers in the locus of the body, and the variable states of perception that encircle us in daily life. In exploring the current and historical modes of media - film, photography, and fashion – I reference familiar modern iconography while playing with our expectations. Hitchcock’s feminine hysteria, the vacant stares of fashion models, and the terror of horror movie victims are the palette I draw from now.

Elizabeth is the current Art Star at FringeUnderground.com. Noted:

fRINGE presents three series of Elizabeth Hendler's photography that place women in the context of a silent, photographic narrative while exploring themes of physical experimentation, violence and perception of the body.

Her work has a gloss and cinematic quality that I admire -- not to mention the slight depravity of the coldly chic scenarios she assembles in her photographs. Definitely do check her out tout de suite.

99 LUX BALLOONS

Last week I read a memorable article in the LA Times ("Hip-hop artists are getting very mouthy about their bling," 11/23/05), and it was the first I had heard of this guy (photo credit: Damon Winter / LAT):

20624621

Hint: He is not only "The People's Champ," but also a specialist in all styles, as they say, of grills, or fine, bejeweled, purely aesthetic dental fronts for rappers and high-steppers.

My newly coined favorite expression of dismissal and disdain:
Paul Wall would never do that.

At the moment, I'm catching up on email while semi-watching a terrifying documentary on the collapse of Mayan civilization. The only bright spot thus far is the description of royal signifiers of wealth and prestige, e.g. a necklace of jaguar teeth.

Horniman_necklace_200x250

[image source]

A necklace of 36 jaguar teeth, when a single jaguar only has four fangs, would have required the capture and killing of nine jaguars; possessing such a totemic item represented prosperity beyond measure.

Nice grill.

Le Cineclub with Emma and Lauren: Walk The Line

Recently, Emma and I saw Walk the Line:

Lauren: Walk The Line - what did you think, Emma? Even more boring than Brisbane?

Emma: Well put!  I would say: Almost more boring than Brisbane.  I certainly checked my watch more times than is ideal when watching a movie you've paid ten bucks for.

Lauren: Brutal honesty. I love it. As you know, I was strangely into this movie.

Emma: Tell us what you dug.

Lauren: Here are some things I've done since I saw it: Dyed my hair dark brown like June Carter Cash, as portrayed by Reese Witherspoon; eaten dinner at "Tennessee Mountain" bbq, albeit in SoHo; downloaded a “Walk The Line” desktop image for my laptop.

Emma: My goodness.  It moved you considerably.

Lauren: Well, the interesting thing is that it just tapped into something else. Like, the movie was just okay…but I forgot what a singular time  that era represents in contemporary American musical history, and I do have a secret crush on all things Rockabilly. I liked it for that essential truth - a brilliant story - but it’s still a decidedly unbrilliant film with no technical thrills whatsoever.

Emma: I can totally relate to that.  I loved the look of the movie, and was very taken with all of Reese/June's costumes. 

Lauren: Arianne Phillips, who did the costume design also did Madonna's Reinvention tour. She is a visionary (again, was compelled to research the look of the film on Friday night).

Emma: That's an interesting factoid.  Yes, she did a brilliant job.  What I also enjoyed were the small parts played by Elvis, by Jerry Lee Lewis, etc,.  That was fun.

Lauren: Reese Witherspoon, whom I loathe like you loathe Kate Winslet (e.g. a total dealbreaker if she is in a film you might see), blew my mind.

Emma: She was pretty good.  And she can sing OK, too.

Lauren: Joaquin Phoenix was similarly moving but not as surprising, since I've always admired his performances, since To Die For with Nicole Kidman.

Emma: It's odd.  I agree he did a fine job but I was never wholly convinced by him.  I certainly never pitied him or became seriously engaged with his supposed plight.  But I think this was to do with the narrative structure.

Lauren: I feel like the main guise of the film was how faithful it was to the story as told by June and John, and that was the #1 priority, not necessarily an amazing script. There were some definite flaws in the narrative and the unevenness of certain parts of the film, e.g. the performances overall, the plot arcs, the tendency to portray people like Vivian, the first wife, and John's father, as one-dimensional villains.

Emma: Right - and it doesn't matter how faithful you are to material, you still have choices to make as a filmmaker.  And in this case the arrangement and the structuring of the story was done in a way that didn't really dramatize everything in the best way.

Lauren: Totally. I just don't think it was the first priority, especially when the primary source is Johnny Cash's two official autobiographies, Cash and Man in Black.

Emma: Maybe.  But it seems to me with such vivid true-life storylines and amazing characters to recreate, there's just no excuse to have a film that's ever boring - and I was often bored during this.

Lauren: It did feel like it was going to end five or six times, and then the last scene was far too group-hug-oriented for my taste. And slow motion: never acceptable.

Emma: Hee!  Yes.  It's weird, because it's hard to really pinpoint why it failed to fulfill its promise.  And the stars did a great job. I think that I didn't really feel Johnny's falling out of love with his first wife, and in love with June: It happened, but it wasn't depicted in a fashion that convinced me.

Lauren: I think the script should have been written by some young hotshot, and it should have been directed by someone with more range, eg Allison Anders…

Emma: Right!  Someone who would have played much left safe.  Because I think that was the main problem: No risks were taken, there were no surprises.

Lauren: An indie phenom ready for the big league.

Emma: Absolutely.

Lauren: Exactly – "playing it safe" is nearly the opposite of the way Johnny Cash lived his life. Or even June Carter Cash, who was a total feminist phenom, even if she wouldn't have defined herself as such. What an amazing female lead that was for Reese -- such a juicy part.

Emma: An amazing, plum role for Reese.  And to be fair, it's hard to imagine another box-office name who would have done even close to as good a job.

Lauren: Absolutely. And her accent was legit.

Emma: It seemed legit to me but I shall take your word for it!

Lauren: I loved the June character - so brash, so true. It's hard to think of a better part for a strong female lead in a film we've seen.

Emma: I know - and the scenes where she was on tour with "the boys" - Johnny, Jerry Lee Lewis and Co - were really funny.  June stuck on a tour bus with a bunch of drunk men.

Lauren: Absolutely -  a metaphor for the music scene and the professional world at large at the time, no doubt.  Shooter Jennings did a nice job of portraying his dad, especially in the "down and out' scene in the apartment...

Emma: Yes, definitely.  And the unknown actress playing John's first wife was interesting too - dull, bitchy and uncomprehending!

Lauren: The space between her eyebrows was her most memorable feature - rather wide, and oddly smooth.

Emma: I think I admired her eyebrows!  I certainly recall admiring her hairdo.

Lauren: She didn't have much to work with -- that part! Those unattractive children! Being a love interest as a footnote!

Emma: Strangely unattractive children!  Very odd. Still, I'm sure the actress was delighted to be cast.

Lauren: But Reese and Joaquin -- the world is their oyster in this film, which sadly fails to materialize as much more than a so-so mall movie.

Emma: That sums it up, I'm afraid.

Lauren: It does. I am going to see it again, though.

Emma: Will you wait for DVD?

Lauren: It's got heart. And great style, even if it skimps on flair. I am going to the theater! Do you feel three peonies is too generous?

Emma: I will definitely concur that it has style!  Bags of style.  No, it can have three.  Two would be too few.  Three is fair.

Lauren: I think so. One for the money, two for the show, three peonies for Walk The Line, and go Cineclub go!

Le Cineclub Rating:

 PeonytinyPeonytinyPeonytiny 

(three out of a possible five peonies)

Previously: A History of Violence, Shopgirl, Kiss Kiss Bang Bang, Nine Lives, Dandelion, Going Shopping, Green Street Hooligans.

 

Houseboat | Heaven

I adore daydreaming about stylish new environs: Heading down South for a spell (I know for a fact that I could get a house with a wraparound porch for less than I pay for my apartment -- just ask my Aunt Juanita)? Berlin in a year? As far as I'm concerned, the possibilities are wide open... and I always daydream about houseboats...Amsterdam, Paris, sunny Sausalito...

In that spirit, I thought I'd share some images from one of my most beloved possessions, the short and sweet Maisons sur l'eau, which I gingerly plucked out of the clearance bin at Hennessey + Ingalls last time I was in Santa Monica.

Published in 1979 by Ste Nille des Editions de Chene, Paris (I have no idea if there is an English edition), the book features photographs by John Blaustein, Eddy Posthuma de Boer, Pedar Ness, and Mark Gabor.

Chronicling houseboat interiors and exteriors in Seattle, California, Florida, Louisiana, Hong Kong, Thailand, Kashmir, France, Great Britain, The Netherlands, Turkey, and Italy, Maisons sur l'eau is absolutely worth seeking out if that's your sort of thing.

Maisons

Maison2
Maison3

Maison4

Windowlicker

05m1140_s

"All serious daring starts from within
—the closing words of Eudora Welty's moving autobiography One Writer's Beginnings — adorn these handcrafted sterling silver bangles made by an artisan in Santa Fe, New Mexico." [$64 at The Reader's Catalog]

Doesn't it though?

Windowlicker - from the French for window shopping: faire du lèche-vitrine - appears on Tuesday and Thursdays at 10am EST.

Baby, Baby, Baby, Baby...

Img03
At the moment, I am rather bewitched by the fashion sensibility espoused by June Carter Cash as memorably portrayed by Reese Witherspoon in Walk The Line (more on that in a bit). The big, chestnut brown hair, heels with A-line skirts Southern Lady, country-folkie '70s style...perfect.

The LA Times has the scoop on costume designer Arianne Phillips, responsible for many iconic looks of the past decade (Hedwig and the Angry Inch! Madonna's Reinvention Tour!).

Reese's make-up was gorgeous (credited to Brad Wilder), especially the pearly pink lipstick with slightly teased hair (stylist: Anne Morgan). YSL Beaute makes a hot one that I can never get enough of: Lisse Gloss in Crystal Pink.

Very much in this vein - check out Hollywood Trading Company's Vintage Leather Hand Painted Bag (do ignore Jessica Simpson; don't miss the exquisite handiwork).

[Image: Annie Leibovitz for Vogue]

Lux.Links + More

  • Vogue Nudist Colony [paper] Why? Because "Every once in a while Vogue magazine does something somewhat daring."
  • This Girl is Taking Bets: Thea Gilmore [guernica] Why? Because ever since I heard her cover of "I'm  Not Down" on Mojo's Radio Clash compilation, I'm not either...
  • Mr Kim Says [a project of evil monito] Why? Because Rickey Kim gets the best mail (see "reviews") and has the most fun.
  • Yinka Shonibare by Anthony Downey [bomb] Why? Because the artist's fusion of politically tinged art with style with make you re-think your take on everything from fashion to history.
  • Barnstormers and Folk Freak Out [supernaturale] Why? Because everything old is new again, always.

The Smart Set: 11.28 - 12.4

Delarrain31694

In this week's edition: Kitty, Yves, Jami, Judy, Odilon, Brigid, and ya, more.

The Winner of the Lux Lotus 52 Projects ("What's Your Excuse?") Challenge

First, thank you to everyone who took the Lux Lotus 52 Projects Challenge, and entered the amended contest. I was quite charmed by your entries, especially the handful that came in after noon on Wednesday.  I am delighted to announce that Jenny Vorwaller is the winner.

Jenny entered before the deadline, and edged ahead of her stiff competition by casually mentioning my new lifestyle philosophy, Dress Like a Cat Until You Get What You Want, which, after all, will never catch on unless it comes up in conversation now and then. Her entry in full:

reasons why i could not be bothered (no time!) for this contest but still want to win:
 
*my personal monthly allowance that i planned to spend on the book went down the tubes when: the electricity went out in the kitchen, our bathtub and sink stopped draining and the toilet clogged ALL IN THE SAME day.
 
*my 6'7" tall husband threw out his back (again!) this weekend and everything creative went on hold to take care of things.  last time this happened, he had to go to the emergency room at 3am. ):
 
*my in-laws are coming into town for thanksgiving this week and the house needs some attention... like, it would be nice to be able to allow them to bathe in the forementioned disabled bathroom
 
*i'm totally willing to dress like a cat until i get what i want (to win this contest) but i just lent out my leather jumpsuit and whiskers and haven't gotten them back yet...
 
*if you pick me, i will totally give you mad props on my own blog (jennyvorwaller.com/blog) and use 52 projects to fuel my creativity...
 
please? say yes! help a girl out and pick her?  

Congratulations Jenny, and thank you to everyone who entered! You're very clever.

Le Cineclub with Emma and Lauren: A History of Violence

Recently, Emma and I saw A History of Violence:

Lauren: OK - A History of Violence? What did you think?

Emma: Well, I had only read quite positive reviews, and I was intrigued by the concept, so my expectations were high.  But I am going to echo what you said when we came out of the movie theatre: I admired it more than I enjoyed it.

Lauren: Yes, I felt like such a man when I realized that I respected the film for its intelligence but derived no pleasure from our encounter.

Emma: Ha ha!

Lauren: Sad but true.

Emma: Now we know how that feels.  Maureen Dowd, are you listening?

Lauren: Totally. I am blowing up her psychic blackberry with our gendered cinematic revelations.  Cineclub doesn't make passes at films who wear glasses.

Emma: That should be our banner!  I suppose one of the things I felt was that it was very conceptually contrived, and stylized. Which was impressive in a non-visceral way - ironic given the highly visceral nature of the violence depicted...

Lauren: It reminded me of something I can only ever understand in the abstract -- that extreme violence is tolerated in American culture, but never extreme sex.  The violence was numbing. Although, on the flipside of that, the hate-fucking was nicely done.

Emma: Yes!  But what also struck me strongly were the violent moments that slid into comedy.  That's a very contemporary, and very weird aspect of the American tolerance of extreme violence - we not only tolerate it, we are amused by it!

Lauren: Absolutely. What do you think of the idea that the film was adapted from a graphic novel? I felt that, in that sense, it seemed like the visual character of the film was highly on point. At times, the tightly controlled shots did seem to unfold like frames in a comic strip.

Emma: I hadn't thought about that but it does make sense: It was stylized in a certain way that is like a comic.

Lauren: Absolutely. Also, what did you think of the interplay between Good and Evil? I was on the edge of my seat every time someone said, I love you, expecting brains to be splattered on the wall in the next frame.

Emma: That's exactly it: There was much more emphasis on plot than verisimilitude. Although we were supposed to be grappling with the moral gray zone of the man stuck between good and evil, in fact there was little moral complexity.  It was simply, you can be good, or you can be bad!

Lauren: Absolutely. Much ado was made about the "bad men" -- and they are always men in this worldview. 

Emma: Indeed -- and even the way Viggo Mortensen’s character divided himself into two people was like a magical transformation.  He couldn't be both, just either/or.

Lauren: And the only woman in the film was too busy being the ultimate Madonna Whore, and the world's most supportive partner! Who dresses up like a cheerleader in the bedroom! Also: I was waiting for her to ruin it all, Claire Forlani-style.

Emma: As you say, the woman who does that is the perfect wife.  And that's one of the aspects that intrigued me about the opening scenes of the film.  The depiction of the perfect family, perfect town, etc, was so over the top, that I assumed we were supposed to see it as such.  D'you know what I mean?

Lauren: Absolutely. The stage was set when the little daughter who seemed to have a bad dye job, p.s., had a dream about "monsters" and the entire family -- Mom Dad and sweet Johnny Average Older Brother -- all rushed to comfort her.  I was like, "Darling; now when does the killing spree start?"

Emma: Right!  And the perfect little coffee shop on Main Street, Normalville, that our man owned, it was exaggeration to emphasize what was to come.  I suppose my question is, why was that excessive contrast necessary?  Or am I misconstruing?

Lauren: It was the kind of story that can be expertly and, more importantly, plausibly told in a two-color graphic novel that relies on striking visual images and plots for narrative power. More intriguingly: I faithfully believed in falsehoods espoused before the "reveal", whereas you didn't at all...

Emma: OK: this is the point where readers who don't want the plot spoiled should look away!

Lauren: ***Spoiler Alert*** Avert your eyes!

Continue reading "Le Cineclub with Emma and Lauren: A History of Violence" »

My Events:


Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 04/2004